If you became a Burst Linker in Accel World, what do you think your Duel Avatar would be like? I personally think mine would be centered on power since in real life I'm rather weak and deep down insecure about it
What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
- All21 posts
- General17 posts
- Off Topic1 post
- Wikia Updates3 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
General
17 Posts
328 Replies
So my friend told me to watch accel world because i like sao and i usually do some research before watching a new series like how much seasons does it have, what is the source material, is it done yet, how much volumes, etc ( i'm fine with light spoilers ) and after reading this wiki for a while i have a few questions
Where did season 1 left off in the light novel
What did the OVA and Movie covers in the novel (and where did it left off)
What is this sao x aw versus thingy and what does that crossover doing in one of the light novel volumes ( my friend told me to skip that volume so i just asking some experts opinions )
Is there anything that i need to skip / re read in the novels because my friend says that some part of the anime didn't adapt the light novel well
Also my friend say something about the episode order that is a little bit messed up so whats that
And yes i have plan to read the light novel after watching the anime
Thank you in advance :)
For the past three years, there have been two Accel World wikis: this one, which acts as the main one, and a smaller one.
Recently, I've talked with the admins of the other wiki about merging the two; the consensus was in favor of merging the smaller wiki into this one.
If you have any questions or concerns, please express them as comments to this post. If no concerns exist, we will begin merging the two wikis shortly.
Hello!
With the new skin that Fandom released, quite a lot of things were changed. One of them was the way wiki backgrounds now work — instead of covering the entire site, the background now covers only the very top of the page, kind of like a header. Thus, our old background will not work anymore.
As such, we now need a new background!
If you have any suggestions, please comment on this post!
(P.S. don't worry if your suggestion doesn't match well with the wiki's current Purple-Blue color scheme. If we need to, we can change the existing color scheme.)
There should be a season 2
There shouldn't be a season 2
12 Votes in Poll
Hello! Recently, an interesting topic has been brought up: should fan-colorings be used in the character infoboxes?
The basic gist of it is as follows:
There are many characters that have no official colored illustrations. However, fan-colorings exist for many of the black-and-white ones and may help add a splash of color to the infobox, enhancing its appearance. On the other hand, it is also inherently risky to use fan-colorings on wikis, since the colors may not be accurate.
To illustrate, let's use the following example of Snow Fairy's page. Which plan should be used?
Plan A: Official illustration, black and white
Plan B: Fan-colored illustration
Plan C: Compromise — Both pictures in the infobox, each on its own image tab
Please let me know which plan you prefer by commenting on this post!
(P.S. If you choose Plan C, please also include which one should be displayed as the "main" one that is shown the moment the page is opened)
Thank you!
Just in case someone is curious, I found this excellent article about Accel World season 2 and the why there can be one still
https://animenextseason.com/accel-world-season-2/
It has been years that the anime was aired in 2012 and it is not known much if there would be possibilities for another season.
Is it possible that the anime will return in the future?
So I picked up one of the OST CDs. Anyone willing to help me put together a Discogs entry for it?
Hello Accel World fans,
I'm Sean from FANDOM's Community Support team. We have been fielding some complaints and questions regarding this wiki, and we have been monitoring the wiki closely.
Frankly, the focus on squabbling over leadership is becoming a distraction. It is absolutely true that communities are the backbone of a wiki and they get to decide who their Admins and Bureaucrats are. The way this generally works is a proposal in leadership, with some discussion and a clear vote. If there is consensus for a change in leadership, then the current Admins or Bureaucrats either demote or promote in line with what the community decided.
Consensus is a difficult thing to measure, but in general it is a distillation of the collective will of all users of the wiki.
The repeated attempts to remove leadership rights don't appear to have broad consensus. Instead, they appear to be the constant back and forth fighting of the dedicated current leadership. They don't display true consensus, but the political infighting of a few individuals. This is not what a Bureaucrat or Admin should be feeding when it comes to local norms.
While I understand that there are deep rifts between the factions here, I think it is best for the wiki if we put these leadership[ removal discussions on hold for a time and everyone gets back to actually working on the wiki. I would like to see everyone put their differences aside and not directly engage in any of these disputes.
Let's get three months of drama-free editing under our belts where the community focuses solely on the content. If, at the end of that time period, the factions aren't at a point where everyone is comfortable working together we can have a definitive leadership discussion, with clearly articulated rules laid out beforehand, extensive scrutiny by FANDOM staff to ensure there are no sockpuppet issues, and a firm time limit.
My hope is that this will prove to be unnecessary and a sustained focus on working together will help heal the wounds, but if not then the intervening period can serve as a kind of reset button. With a moratorium on demotion threads, we can avoid any of the issues with the past cluster of them.
In either case, everyone appreciates the extra work demanded of Admins and Bureaucrats. Community leaders don't need to be best friends, but they do need to reach a point where they realize they are in the same boat and need to find ways to work together for the good of the community.
This post is locked.
After all the previous discussion, there seems to be some confusions over how should those results being interpreted. In order to reduce the amount of confusion, here I would hold a vote that each member of the community should cast their vote on the issue being stated.
Topic: Demote User:Robyn Grayson from the wiki's bureaucrat position
Voting Rule:
1. Every member should only make one reply in this thread, and that reply should only consists of "Agree" or "Disagree", because discussion about rationales have already be done on the other post. Any member who have made more than one reply in this thread, or replied with something other than agree or disagree, will be ignored.
2. Because wikia members only need to vote in this thread and thus there are no need to discuss about the thread, this poll will be opened for just enough amount of time that would allow everyone to express their opinion. (This exclue the user in question for obvious reason.)
3. In order to response to concerns about puppetry, Only editors who have edited this wikia before April 11, 2017 (The first post causing this series of disucssion) are eligible to vote in this post.
(edited by Qunow)
This post is locked.
Hello everyone, I'm ZeHaffen and I help edit the Accel World wiki, among other forms of working with this series.
I, as well as other editors here, have recently come to the conclusion that the user Robyn Grayson has proven himself to be unfit for his roles as admin and bureaucrat of this wiki. As such, I would like to put his status up to a community vote. Anyone is free to vote, please simply tell us why you support or oppose the proposed demotion.
I would also like to propose demotion of Game Boterator, a bot owned by Robyn Grayson, from its bureaucrat role as a bot has no need for such a powerful position and could even be used to abuse power.
I will allow others to post the reasons behind their opinions before I post mine. I will also be taking the results of this proposal to Wikia staff in one week, which I believe is sufficient time to allow for users to voice their opinions.
Thank you, and I look forward to hearing from you all.
This post is locked.
"Accel World:
I find this unnecessary as this is already the accel world wiki, why not we remove and just leave the name after it? Ex: If it's a video game, the video game's name will be the title of the page and be in the category "Video Games".
This is a quick vote so please use 'Support' or 'Oppose'. No reason is required, however it is optional.
This post is locked.
Greetings, everyone- no, fellow contributors.
Recently, a long standing editor and bureaucrat, Qunow, had promoted one of her friends, Rich Richie, to administrator without consulting me or the community, suggesting heavy personal bias. I held a live discussion with both of them and had concluded that Rich will stay demoted and must deserve those rights like any other user through work. However, the next day, Qunow had ignored the consensus and repromoted Rich to buro, again without consulting anyone. This is incredibly unfair to future contributors who wish to get staff and something must be done. I have the chat logs of our discussion, they can be seen [[Project:Chat/Logs/9 Apr 2017|here.]] Please leave your opinion on whether or not they should stay or leave as a staff.
Anyone is free to vote, including the ones who are involved.
Please leave a reason why you support or oppose the demotion or else it may be seen as bias-voting (asking people to vote for you) and be counted as invalid.
The thread will close in one week, I'll leave my own vote after 3 users have voted. Thank you for your time.
Why the page for infinite burst is awaited for deletion?
