Very well.

Your reason for opposing? I'm adding it to the tally.

Simply put, Rich Richie has demonstrated himself to be a competent editor and should be given a chance as admin. If Qunow, a longstanding contributor and bureaucrat, believes he is competent, then it stands to reason that he deserves a chance. Moreover, you did not initially discuss the removal of Qunow, and should provide better reason than just "he's biased" before demoting him.

Essentially, do unto others as you would have them do unto you. If you want a demonstration of reasoning and evidence of contributions before an admin is added, then others deserve a demonstration of reasoning and evidence of guilt before an admin is removed. Fair's fair.

A shorter one, I meant. Perhaps as short as those before you?

Extending 7 hours until the Defan has replied.

Hello, I am not confident in whether the full idea of my comment get conserved in some of the other's post, so please read my original comment in the post to understand my comments on the issue.

@Robyn what Defan is saying is that "I think Rich Richie demonstrated himself to be a competent editor and should be given a chance as admin" as what he says in his latest comment. That should be the reason to oppose my demotion.

By the way, you should be able to extract the reason yourself like what you did previously?

Updated. This thread will close in 20 minutes. KidProdigy please reply before then.

Not to be taking sides but, it really was never stated anywhere that opinions would be valid for a vote, their votes would be disqualified, as per the rule states.

I guess the current tally stands at:

Rich Richie's Demotion:

Opposes: 1

Supports: 3

Qunow's Demotion:

Opposes: 1

Supports: 2

Neutral :1

Time is up, unfortunately. The discussion will close.